Mind blown! 10 philosophy books guaranteed to make you think differently

Philosophy does not have to be limited to Hegel and Frege. Like all disciplines, it gets complex for the layperson once you scratch below the crust. Above all else, philosophy is about thinking deeply. Anyone can give that a shot. You must start somewhere. In a discipline ranging from economics and politics to the nature of reality and the ethics of extreme sports, there is much to choose from.
Forget that you have not read everything from Plato to Žižec. Expand your mind with these 10 philosophy books for deep thinking newbies.
Essential philosophy books
Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex (1949)

Do not be put off by the weight of this volume. You need no prior knowledge. De Beauvoir’s text guides you through the intricacies of her argument without an academic tutor. It provides a thorough grounding in Marxist feminist thought. It is a fantastic historical survey of the difference between sex and gender. As the author says, one is not born, but rather becomes, woman.
Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (1961)

German political theorist Hannah Arendt disavowed the label philosopher. Her work focuses on power, authority and democracy. As a European Jew who fled to America during the Holocaust, she is concerned with violence and its relation to the left and the right. All her books are excellent. Eichmann in Jerusalem is a study on whether evil is radical or thoughtless, based on her reportage on Eichmann’s post-war trial.
Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil (1886)

Nietzsche slams the idea of traditional morality. He accuses other moral philosophers of being dogmatic. He argues that good and evil are different expressions of the same basic instincts. Nietzsche’s iconoclastic attitude is energizing. This is a good read whether or not you find yourself convinced. Check out Thus Spake Zarathustra for more of the same.
Jean Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract (1762)

This text helped stir up political fervor in late eighteenth century France. It argued against the divine right of the monarch to rule. It made the case for the people’s ability to rule themselves. It interrogates the idea of legitimate political authority. It suggests a democratic model that can work out legislation within the state. It remains relevant today.
Antonio Gramsci, The Prison Notebooks (1929-1935)

Gramsci was an Italian Marxist imprisoned by his country’s Fascist government in 1926. He wrote these notebooks while in jail. They are structurally unsystematic because he was in prison at the time. They are wide-ranging. He covers Fascism, Fordism, Italian history, the French revolution, folklore, religion and culture. He critiques capitalism and the cultural hegemony that maintains it. You can dip in and out of this one.
Niccolò Machiavelli, The Prince (1532)

This political treatise from the sixteenth century remains current. Machiavelli was a politician and a political theorist who wrote about power. He explains how to get it, how to wield it and how to maintain it. Realpolitik debuts here. Political philosophy was never the same afterwards.
G.E.M. Anscombe, Intention (1957)

Anscombe wrote on mind, logic, language and ethics. She is best known for her work on action theory. Intention is about action and practical reasoning. It is difficult compared to other texts here. Her easy prose style is at odds with the complexity of her arguments. She is a giant among analytic philosophers.
Daniel Dennett, The Intentional Stance (1987)

This book fits into the category of philosophy of mind. Dennett examines how we explain and predict the actions of others by using different levels of abstraction. The intentional stance assumes something operates with belief or intent rather than mechanically. Dennett is an engaging writer. If you have read Anscombe, this will be easy.
Donna Haraway, A Cyborg Manifesto (1985)

This is an essay titled A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. Like de Beauvoir, Haraway argues that being female is socially constructed. She uses the cyborg to reject rigid boundaries between human and machine. Check out her book Simians, Cyborgs and Women (1990) for further essays.
[CTA_PLACE_HOLDER]





Great to see Sophie’s World listed. It might be a novel, but IMO it’s an excellent, accessible work if you need a brush-up on philosophy or have just wanted to get your feet wet but didn’t know how.
Sophie’s World is beyond excellent. It’s the kind of book you should give or read aloud to every bookish 8 year old. And recommend subsequent rereading every few years because this book grows with you like few others.
Some people might find Gaarder’s other books easier to approach. These, Including the Solitaire Mystery, do however mostly lack the deep integration of specific philosphic vocabulary Sophie’s World offers. But they have an astoundingly intriguing, mystifying feel to them, like Sophie’s World. It will make you feel like that time you read a Harry Potter novel or watched The Matrix on while high.
speaking of scandinavian novels with a philosophical side, check out Erlend Loe’s “Naive. Super” for a much lighter read
Ok this is a stretch if we’re looking for only philosophy related stuff, but I think Tove Jansson’s later Moomin novels approache some of the same existential stuff as Loe. Moominpappa at Sea is such a great attempt at depicting personal crises and depression.
The Prison Notebooks us one of the more influential books i have read in my life, Gramsci’s work was a very big part of my grad school years as I found his theory of hegemony key in my understanding and research in mass communications. One of my favorite research papers involved the examination of television talk shows (ala Rikki Lake, Jerry Springer, the trashy sorts) within the framework of Gramsci’s concept of hegemony. Great stuff even if you have to take it slowly
It took me a full month to The Second Sex, but I’m so happy I stuck with it. Beauvoir’s ability to sum up millennia of the treatment of women is astounding, even as I did not agree with all of her arguments. She is definitely a woman of her time, in midcentury France. As such, some of her descriptions of women or their lifestyles are outdated, but it doesn’t undermine her strengths. Definitely recommend
Every one of these “books” are anti-capitalist, anti-individual, pro progressive, pro-social justice…Where is the balance..?
I think it assumes a general population of pro capitalist, pro individual, conservative, people. In which case these books would present a departure from their normal viewpoint.
Maybe because those are all characteristics that deep thinkers posses?
Who would be anti-individual, anti-social justice and anti-progressive? Bible thumpers?
I am surprised that this looks at only western philosophy books….which as per my reads are completely biased towards its approach and looks at every aspect from a purely materialistic viewpoint…having read Indian Philosophy…I am convinced the East has a more holistic approach to philosophy and covers 90% more areas about philosophy and life which exposes the mind to higher realms of existence…
We explore the latent response of philosophy and religion to the global economic arena at http//tapsearch.com/therationale-journal
We have not found a replacement for Jaques Maritain which we feel it the last great philosopher of our times. His distinction between individuality and personality is a key to seeking the life ideal of earth and the common good of all society in the natural order of things.
Just for the reference – the name of the Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Žižek is written with a k, not a c. You might want to check the spelling of his name at the beginning. Otherwise, a really good selection – even though the emphasis is strongly on the female and feminist writers (sauf Nietzsche, of course).
Most of these are utter drivel and completely illegitimate critiques lacking all real basis and scientific understanding. Nietzsche and the other more modernist authors mentioned remarkably seem to make more assumptions and get more wrong on human nature and nature in general than the old writers. I would absolutely love to see a non-market system work, or an attempt to prove why gender is a construct, or a stable areligious, or stable atheist, or any non-conservative society last for very long with very high development.