17 little known facts about 2001: A Space Odyssey
According to Arthur C. Clarke, Stanley Kubrick wanted an insurance policy from Lloyd’s of London. He sought protection against losses if extraterrestrial intelligence were discovered before the movie release. Lloyd’s refused.
The total footage shot was 200 times the final length of the film. Stanley Kubrick had several tons of sand imported, washed and painted for the moon surface scenes.
Production details
The carry-on bags belonging to Russian space scientists with whom Dr. Floyd shares a drink are marked Aeroflot in Cyrillic. It remains the Russian national airline today.
A working title was Voyage Beyond the Stars. When Fantastic Voyage was released, Kubrick reportedly disliked the film. He did not want his work to sound similar. He chose 2001 because it is the first year of the 21st century and the 3rd millennium.
The main Discovery set was built by aircraft manufacturer Vickers-Armstrong. It was a 12-meter by two-meter drum designed to rotate at five km per hour. It cost $750,000.
The entire film contains only 205 special effects shots. For comparison, Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope had 350 and Episode III – Revenge of the Sith had over 2,200.
Sound and dialogue
There is no dialogue in the first 25 minutes of the movie. It ends when a stewardess speaks at 25:38. There is also no dialogue in the last 23 minutes. The movie contains around 88 dialogue-free minutes.
Rock band Pink Floyd was approached to perform music for the film. They turned it down due to other commitments.
Aside from the film’s music, no sound is heard in the space sequences. There is no sound in space.
Characters and makeup
Frank Poole and Dave Bowman watch a television interview on BBC 12. This was a play on the fact that only BBC 1 and 2 existed during production. The presenter is Kenneth Kendall, the first newsreader seen on British TV in 1955.
Kubrick originally asked Stuart Freeborn to create human-like makeup for the early man scenes. He could not photograph them in full length without an X-rating because they were naked. Kubrick used the hairy monkey model instead. Humans in costumes played all roles except for two baby chimpanzees.
HAL 9000 never says “Good Morning, Dave” despite it being a famous quotation. Originally, HAL was to be called Athena and have a female voice.
Music and editing
Kubrick originally commissioned a complete original score from composer Alex North, who had previously scored Spartacus. After months of work, North’s entire score was discarded without his knowledge. Kubrick chose to use the temporary classical music tracks he had been editing to, including Johann Strauss’s The Blue Danube and Richard Strauss’s Also sprach Zarathustra. North did not learn his score had been dropped until the premiere.
The famous match cut from a bone thrown into the air to an orbiting nuclear weapon satellite is widely considered one of the greatest edits in cinema history. It compresses four million years of human evolution into a single cut.
Kubrick personally destroyed nearly all of the props, sets, and special effects machinery after production wrapped. He reportedly did not want other filmmakers to reuse them and produce inferior work. This decision means that very few original artefacts from the film survive today.
Special effects and technology
The film’s special effects took eighteen months to complete. Many of the techniques were invented specifically for this production. Kubrick and effects supervisor Douglas Trumbull developed the slit-scan photography process used for the Star Gate sequence, creating the appearance of travelling at immense speed through an abstract corridor of light and colour.
The tablet computers used by astronauts aboard the Discovery spacecraft are strikingly similar to modern iPads. Samsung cited 2001 as prior art during its patent dispute with Apple in 2011, arguing that the film had anticipated tablet design decades earlier.
To simulate zero gravity inside the spacecraft, Kubrick commissioned a 30-ton rotating set nicknamed the “ferris wheel.” It was 12 metres in diameter and could rotate at up to 5 kilometres per hour. The camera was mounted to the set so it rotated with the actors, creating the illusion that they were walking in a complete loop inside the centrifuge.
No computer-generated imagery was used in the film. Every visual effect was achieved through practical means including front projection, model work, rotoscoping and hand-painted animation cels. The film won the Academy Award for Best Visual Effects and remains a benchmark for practical effects work.
Reception and legacy
This was the last movie made about men on the moon before Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walked there. Conspiracy theorists claim the moon landing was a hoax directed by Kubrick using leftover props from this movie.
At the premier, 241 people walked out. Rock Hudson asked what the film was about. Arthur C. Clarke stated that if people understood the film completely, the creators had failed. They wanted to raise questions rather than answer them.







What I find very telling is that critics denounced the film; completely and utterly wrote it off. However, after the cult following made it a huge hit, they all changed their tune.
Hence why critics should always be ignored.
I’m not sure how much research you did.
But, the reviews I’ve read (and remember reading at the time of the movie) were generally positive.
Such as Roger Ebert’s original review :
http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/2001-a-space-odyssey-1968
Brilliance/genius is so often accompanied by eccentricity.
Which is why Kubrick is (and was) so often misunderstood and vilified.
as crazy as this may sound, there are many things about 2001 and 2010 that may actually be based on truth. i am currently gathering more information to further prove this. many people agree Hollywood has been used to plant small amounts of truth (mixed with fantasy) behind extraterrestrial life in movies.
truth about what? the moon landings were faked. This film is a work of sci-fi genius and special effects were top rate for the time. What Kubrick did is get it in people’s mind that space travel is possible, what the moon looks like, the earth in orbit, etc. then he faked moon landings. You ate it up as everyone else in the public, including me.
>7. Rock band Pink Floyd was at one point approached to perform music for the film. However they turned it down due to other commitments.
This is 100% not true. Stanley Kubrick sourced the music in 1967, while Pink Floyd were relatively unknown. He did approach them later for his movie “A Clockwork Orange.” He wanted to use their piece “Atom Heart Mother.” Upon hearing that he would chop it up and distribute it throughout the movie, the band elected to not allow the use of the music. Roger Waters has said that this was a huge mistake. Source: “http://www.amazon.com/Comfortably-Numb-Inside-Story-Floyd/dp/0306817527” Comfortably Numb: the Inside Story of Pink Floyd
This is one of the greatest sci-fi’s of all time. And Kubrick is one of the greatest also.
That said, I believe Kubrick did help produce the fake moon landings, and this film was
financed by NASA. Arthur C. Clarke came up with the idea of a Satellite, which are not even possible, due to orbiting in the Thermosphere which would melt anything a satellite is made of. Nasa is full of BS and Kubrick’s wife and daughter have disclosed the work he did to fake the moon landings. I know there a lot of space cadets where this crushes their fantasies and dreams, but Neil and Buzz did not go to the moon. And no one will go
to Mars, it is all BS.
The moon landings were not faked. And all the so-called visual anomalies have been debunked.
Kubrick’s moonscapes in ‘2001’ look different in texture and topography from how the moon really looks. There are many actual moon pictures to look at and they are consistent with each other and different from the best scientific predictions that influenced fictional depictions including Kubrick’s. I don’t know why I’m bothering with this reply; if you’re determined to believe it was a fake, I won’t change your mind here, but just look at all the many pictures from the Apollo missions. The Saturn V rocket alone is too expensive to simply be part of an elaborate ruse – and they launched six of them.
By the way, I love ‘2001’.
Clarke invented the idea of *geosynchronous* satellites — satellites which stay relatively stationary above one point on the equator (a bit of orbital wobble, usually). The idea of (artificial) satellites, generally are probably about as old as Newtonian physics.
Of course, if you think that satellites, generally are impossible, then you’re in a bad place. This would mean that GPS is a hoax, along with satellite TV, Google maps, the Hubble space telescope, remote sensing and a host of other things.
Do you believe that trips to the outer planets are faked as well?
Dude, the Moon landings are ridiculously easy to prove. They even had this in Big Bang Theory. You can (and many many people have) shoot a laser at the moon and bounce it off reflectors left there by the Apollo 11 mission. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiment
Psychotropic? I was only too glad to help out.
How is it in this modern age no one, and I mean absolutely no one, who knows in proper grammar form it is never not once despite? It is in spite of. EVERY TIME. Boggles my mind. Next thing you know, people will start saying surreal and basically in everything they are talking about.
Eh? I don’t understand what you are saying. “people will start saying surreal and basically in everything they are talking about”. WTF
Elon musk laneded on Mars last night, he’s just too busy to tell anyone about yet ….